Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Rover V8, SU v Edelbrock 500

  1. #1
    NSRA member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    5,120
    Images
    2

    Rover V8, SU v Edelbrock 500

    The tube of you decided this might interest me. From a purely spectator perspective it did. Bit surprising really as many look to go down the 4 barrel route. Using a 500 though, which I thought were too big for an RV8, instead of the 390?


    https://youtu.be/LN1XcBGKc8s?si=yokBqV9ROtwr6GAX

    Chris



    Sent from my SM-T515 using NSRA mobile app
    Bumper sticker - This is an historic vehicle and only has three speeds....... if you don't like this one you sure as hell won't like the others.

  2. #2
    NSRA member tom.marg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    721
    As expected? 4 barrel will let it breath.
    once tuned correctly I’d expect it so be much nicer than SU.
    The 500 part would seem big, but technically it’s got room on the air side and tune the fuel side.

    The 383 I used to race with had a 1050 on it. On the dyno the volumetrics were spot on, the motor pulled 950CFM. So 100Cfm ‘room’ if you like. Perfect it will never starv of air!

    YouTube - Toms Custom Shop
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCro...hD-y5NuJyZAA2Q
    8.43 @ 157 - Rail
    10.37 @ 128 - Doors

  3. #3
    NSRA member kapri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    26,030
    500cfm is measured differently to a 390 . One is 1" vacuum and other is 2" , apples vs oranges.


    EDIT , I'm talking balls , they are not rated differently but apparently the 500 only flows 400 due to 'booster ring'?
    Last edited by kapri; 24-12-24 at 11:16 AM.
    Galations 6:7

  4. #4
    NSRA member mygasser's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    7,674
    Quote Originally Posted by kapri View Post
    500cfm is measured differently to a 390 . One is 1" vacuum and other is 2" , apples vs oranges.
    which is which kev? don't leave us hanging, lol.
    neil.

  5. #5
    NSRA member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    5,120
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by kapri View Post
    500cfm is measured differently to a 390 . One is 1" vacuum and other is 2" , apples vs oranges.
    I'll admit to being confused, which isn't uncommon!

    I'd forgotten that the 390 I was referring to was a Holley 390cfm which seem to be marketed as ideal for 3500 RV8's. Unsure about the differing measuring sticks though.

    Chris

    Sent from my SM-T515 using NSRA mobile app
    Bumper sticker - This is an historic vehicle and only has three speeds....... if you don't like this one you sure as hell won't like the others.

  6. #6
    NSRA member Mick70RR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    85
    Before 4 barrel carbs were available single and 2 barrel carbs were flowed at 3" of vacuum. When 4 barrel carbs came out the flow benches could not achieve 3" of vacuum because of the increase in flow through the carb, so 1.5" of vacuum was used as the standard.
    As an example, the Mopar 6 pack carbs are rated at 1350 cfm, that's 3 x 2 barrel carbs, each rated at 450cfm and flowed at 3" of vacuum.
    A Holley 4 barrel rated at 950cfm, flowed at 1.5" of vacuum flows the same amount of air as the Mopar 6 pack set up.
    Two different carb setups with different flow ratings but they flow the same.

    The Holley 390cfm and 500cfm carbs are both 4 barrels and so will have been flowed at 1.5" of vacuum.
    1970 Plymouth Road Runner, 505 CI, 4 speed, GV overdrive, 8 3/4" 3.91 gears. 11.98 @ 117mph.

  7. #7
    NSRA member kapri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    26,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick70RR View Post
    Before 4 barrel carbs were available single and 2 barrel carbs were flowed at 3" of vacuum. When 4 barrel carbs came out the flow benches could not achieve 3" of vacuum because of the increase in flow through the carb, so 1.5" of vacuum was used as the standard.
    As an example, the Mopar 6 pack carbs are rated at 1350 cfm, that's 3 x 2 barrel carbs, each rated at 450cfm and flowed at 3" of vacuum.
    A Holley 4 barrel rated at 950cfm, flowed at 1.5" of vacuum flows the same amount of air as the Mopar 6 pack set up.
    Two different carb setups with different flow ratings but they flow the same.

    The Holley 390cfm and 500cfm carbs are both 4 barrels and so will have been flowed at 1.5" of vacuum.
    Yeah ...THAT LOL . I was remembering electric fan cfm comparison at 1 and 2"

    Again from memory 390 is actually a tad big for stock Rover 3.5 , 365 cfm requirement as stock ?

    I'm SURE I read somewhere thta Edelbrock 500 was actually less flow that 390 RPI I think ?

    EDIT , my meory is starting to fail I think. The truth is that apparently the 500 only flows 400 due to booster ring size ??

    Anyway these figures would suggest otherwise ?

    Edelbrock 500:
    Primaries: 1-7/16"
    Secondaries: 1-11/16"

    Holley 390:
    All: 1-7/16"
    Last edited by kapri; 24-12-24 at 11:18 AM.
    Galations 6:7

  8. #8
    NSRA member Acker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    225
    Interesting
    I ran a [emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]] double pumper on a race engine pushing [emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]bhp
    Never checked flow rates on it though.



    Sent from my iPhone using NSRA mobile app

  9. #9
    NSRA member mygasser's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    7,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Acker View Post
    Interesting
    I ran a [emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]] double pumper on a race engine pushing [emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]bhp
    Never checked flow rates on it though.



    Sent from my iPhone using NSRA mobile app
    sent from your iphone? seems you need an upgrade

  10. #10
    NSRA member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    871
    I,ve got a edelbrock 500 on my rover sd1 3.9 and it's spot on . _smiley:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •