..cherish or ignore ? Following on from a few comments on the British T thread should we cherish what was achieved with little knowledge of what we were doing and a lack of instruction books / rod heritage to build on?
Or should we simply ignore it all as it was not done to the ( now ) accepted American ideal ?
I remember an article in Street Rodder back in the late 70's reporting on the BelleVue show with queries about some of the cars on show.Even with some of the rods nobody mentioned that the shiny new catalogues we had were meant to be divided into sections / styles.
Yup , a time that taste forgot in many cases but it didn't take long to find our feet and, even during those times, some timeless classics that would stand alongside the best the States could offer were built THIS side of the pond.
Much of the 'stuff built during that time leaves us with a legacy that will help us fight our corner in the future
Without those early days there would have been nothing for Lowflyers to rebel against to create the start of a global phenomenom, that surely is something to be proud of coming from OUR history?
So should we simply ignore all that and decry /sweep under the carpet anything that we did that didn't fit in the 'little books' style which is now so popular ( which wouldn't be now without OUR history that precedes it )? History is history and you have to know where you've been to know where you are going surely?